[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: ST Article
- Subject: Re: ST Article
- From: Eric Sheley <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 16:20:35 -0500
At 03:42 PM 11/18/1999 -0500, Bill Flowers wrote:
>> say that it can scarcely be faulted. I got the feeling that he just
felt it
>> was too much a copy versus something that revolutionary in the sport
tourer
>> category.
>
>Evolution of a concept, not revolution.
change above to "versus (adding) something (new)(ie styling / functionality
of a part etc) that (was) revolutionary"
Right word - poor sentence. Maybe I need to proof a little more....
- - Eric
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=