Re:

[Marc Cook <marccook@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's likely, but it's just as likely that the RS was a 49-state model. Our
testbikes are registered to Triumph in GA.

> From: "Rick Damiani" <rickd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 01:37:01 -0700
> To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: 
> 
>> From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx]On
>> Behalf Of Marc Cook
>> 
>> We did have a problem with color coding on the comparison
>> dyno chart. The raw numbers I have here show peak horsepower
>> of 93.6 at 9500 rpm and peak torque of 61.5 ft-lb @ 5250.
>> (That's a very impressive spread between peak torque and hp.)
>> I don't have the dyno chart from the Sprint ST we tested,
>> but 94 hp shows about a 13% drop from claimed crank hp to
>> rear-wheel hp; pretty typical.
> 
> When I had my CA-spec ST dyno tested at Vance and Hines, I got just
> over 90BHP at the rear wheel - a significant difference compared to
> the 101 BHP the '99 ST seemed to be getting in Cycle World and
> Motorcyclist last year. Perhaps the '99 ST Motorcyclist tested was a
> 49-state model?
> 
> 
> 
> *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> 


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=