Re: Fuel Sender Official Count

["Rick Schmitz" <Rick.Schmitz@xxxxxxx>]

No they haven't said they won't but they haven't either come out and said we
have a problem and we would like to fix it, so the fault is there's for not
being proactive, the proof is in the pudding by posts on mailing lists like
this. Don't get me wrong, I love my bike, but TOA hasn't been exactly
stellar in their handling of this problem.
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Sheley" <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Fuel Sender Official Count


> At 08:36 PM 8/28/00 -0400, Robert Smith wrote:
> >Sorry to twist off on you folks.  But I have to say something....
> >Ok, I'm getting really tired of seeing these posts (no offense intended
> >to those posting the information).
>
> but you are more than willing to add another post and fan the flames a
> little more....
>
> >What is Triumph doing about this?
> >Any Triumph management reading this? What's the plan folks? Time to do
> >SOMETHING?
>
> Triumph has new units in the field right now. If you have a leak, then get
> it fixed. They are not ignoring the problem, they have not said that there
> is no problem with the senders and at no time have they said that they
will
> do nothing to fix the problem.
>
> - Eric
>
>
>
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

------------------------------