[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Triumph Performance Pipes



Lisa,

In another post, you stated that you preferred the sound of the CF can over
the stainless.

When I ordered my stainless steel can, I specifically asked my dealer
whether or not there were any performance and/or sound differences between
the two styles and he stated that both performance pipes are identical
except for the outer wrap and that both pipes therefore have identical
performance and sound.  According to him, the only difference between the
two is aesthetics.

Can anyone confirm this to be the case?

Thanks,

Paul Wilson
Toronto, Canada
- -----Original Message-----
From: Richard & Lisa White <RedRiders@xxxxxxx>
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 05, 2000 10:26 AM
Subject: Triumph Performance Pipes


>After doing a little over 300 miles yesterday with our new Triumph
>carbon fiber wrap pipes, Richard & I returned home very happy with the
>bike's performance.  That "chuggy" spot between 2,500 and 3,000 rpms is
>gone, and I found power delivery increased across the band!  It was
>great fun, and the noise is sweet when running in the low gears, but not
>annoying (or headache creating) when running at highway speeds.  We're
>glad we purchased them!
>
>Lisa "Aqua Dawg" White
>Houston, Texas
>
>
>     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=