[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: Rear brakes, front rotors
- Subject: RE: Rear brakes, front rotors
- From: "Rick Damiani" <rickd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 22:37:28 -0800
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Jonathan West
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 7:27 AM
> To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Rear brakes, front rotors
>
>
> Blake,
> You're right about the wooden feel of the rear brake. It doesn't do
> much, but it was designed that way. You think its bad on
> your ST, try a
> 509 or 595- Triumph could have left if off and saved a few pounds.
>
> Rick,
> What's up with your rotors? Minimum thickness exceeded?
> Warped? If
> they are warped, why aren't you getting them warrantied?
> Triumph has
> been good about it in the past. Nobody should be replacing rotors
> yearly. That's crazy. Something aint right.
Below the minimum thickness on the left, right at the limit on the
right. I had been using non-stock pads the last 20,000 miles, so that
may have had something to do with it.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=