Re: Turbo

["Kyle Rocke" <kyle.rocke@xxxxxxxxx>]

According to Brian at Turbo Connection, the lower psi was totally okay for
the octane that you are talking about. But if you plan on using the higher
psi, you'd better use higher octane.

I've got it easy here in Sweden. The lowest octane is 95.

Kyle
Stockholm Sweden
99 ST Turbo "Black Widow"


- -----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Jenkins <jeff.jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, November 10, 2000 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: Turbo


>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Kyle Rocke" <kyle.rocke@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 2:52 PM
>Subject: Re: Turbo
>
>
>> Hi Jeff,
>>
>> Here's a little specs on the kits. I also wrote some comments below
>
>THANKS for the info!  The Stage II kit sounds great but I don't really know
>if I want to go that deep into the engine, part of my considering the stage
>I kit was that I could within reason put it on and take it off without too
>much trouble, at least theoreticly.  (bolt it on, plug it in, and ride)
>
>What kind of fuel requirements are on the stage two kit?  I run 93 octane
>premium always, don't want to have to start buying specialty racing gas or
>anything....  Basicly I'm just wanting an even MORE FUN bike and this
sounds
>like it would do the trick.  Any comments about how it affects the rest of
>the bike as far as lifespan goes?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=