Re: test rides(Re: [ST] still wishy-washy)

["Andrew Reynolds" <Andrewreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The message was suggesting the ST's engine characteristics would be very
similar to the RS's which was available for a test ride, not the VFR's.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Karl Gagné" <jim.jay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: test rides(Re: [ST] still wishy-washy)


>
> > I do know they are different.  But the test ride would at least give me
> > a good sense of the engine's strength and powerband, which should be
> > similar to the ST.
>
> wrong man just check top gear roll-ons 60-80 mph     st 3.83  vfr 5.23,
> that says a lot about midrange or in the vfr case, lack of.      8^)
>
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=