[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: [ST] New Daytona



At 11:48 PM 2/20/01 -0500, Joel Ashman wrote:
>IMHO, I'm not digging it.  Looks like a Kaw from the front, and a Suzuki
>from the rear.  I know that that folks call the ST's looks 'uninspired' or
>'plain' but I never thought that.  Unfortunatly, that is what I think of
>when I look at the first pics of the Daytona.

Some better pics are now up at http://www.t5net.com/new-daytona/

>They are trying to hard to be
>like the competion, instead of being better (or different).  That is why I
>bought my ST.  It is different, and better.

Ditto that.

>Bummer about the rear swing arm too.  I hope it doesn't go away on the S3.
>New engine would be nice though!

I would guess that the move is away from the single siders.

- -Eric


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=