Re: [ST] re: new Daytona pics?

[Erik Miner <Axeis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I beg to disagree. ALL of the reviews I've read have said great 
handling, great brakes, good gear box, so-so styling.. but the 
biggest problem is that it's not competitive in the engine dept.

Erik


> Before everyone jumps in the fact that the TT
>has been a sales flop has nothing to do with the engine itself.
>Ashley
>'95 Speed Triple
>'00 Spondon
>
> >
> > So where are the pics of the new Daytona? Our firewall is on the fritz
> > at the moment, so I can't even pull up the Triumph website, though I doubt
>the
> > pics are there. Any specs to go with the pics? I've heard it's supposed to
>be a
> > lot lighter and have more power, of course, and maybe even be a boring ol'
> > inline-four.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > "Jedi"  Jim
> >
> >      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>*
> >       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> >           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> >    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> >
>
>
>     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=