Re: RS Lights & side panels

["Neil Lindsey" <neil@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stephenson"

> >  > > Mine was the original cyclops! Parted with the necessary
> > £11, fitted the
> >  > > relays outside the dealers and then asked them to check
> > the Main & Dip
> >  > > light
> >  > > aim. No difference and no adjustments required.
> >  >
> >  > It's interesting that both lenses are different from mine.
> >  >
> >  > I stand on my original suggestion, which was that there
> > must be a difference
> >  > in how the headlights will operate when, after the
> > additional relays are
> >  > installed, they are now both on for low and both on for
> > high.  But I'm
> >
> > why do you say that?  i can't explain the difference in part numbers,
> > but i'm not sure why triumph would go to the expense of designing
> > separate lenses for a single market, when the existing dual-use lenses
> > would work just fine.
>
>
> Maybe I am missing something obvious here, but wouldn't the different part
> numbers just be because of the differences required for driving on the
> different side of the road? The part numbers for my Australian 2000 ST are
> the same as the UK model, which fits since both UK and Australia drive on
> the same side, opposite to Nth America.
>
you may be absolutely right -- do your lights work together or
one-at-a-time?

Neil



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=