[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: OEM v. Aftermarket front sprockets
- Subject: Re: OEM v. Aftermarket front sprockets
- From: Erik Miner <Axeis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:13:30 -0500
Darren I recently faced the same dilemma. After speaking with my
dealer and Triumph I sprung for the OEM front, ( steel AFAM rear)
The reasons I was given for sticking with the OEM front are reduced
transfer of vibration to the transmission, resulting in smooth
shifts, longer life, and less vibration.
Erik
>I had a look for an 18 tooth front sprocket for my ST a while ago. The
>Triumph part is about 3 times the price of an aftermarket one. However the
>aftermarket one was a conventional ( 1 piece) steel sprocket while the
>Triumph one appeared to have a sort of cush drive between the splined &
>teethed parts.
>
>Has anyone tried both types & noted any difference ?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Darren Mason.
>2000 ST.
>Melbourne, AuSTralia.
>
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=