[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[ST] Re:child protection
- Subject: [ST] Re:child protection
- From: Vioscaltd@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:59:38 EDT
In a message dated 7/5/01 12:01:32 PM Central Daylight Time,
owner-st-digest@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Would you, as the "at fault" party take full responsibility and pay the
> appropriate consequences, or start pointing fingers at the parent who
didn't
> take appropriate protective actions? Look deep and answer honestly.
>
> - -Chris Strizver
>
This has allready happened and the parent should be held responsible for not
protecting the child properly. Therefore I think the riders parents should
be held responsible for the child on the bike not wearing the proper
protective clothing 8>)
David "Bird Dawg" Viosca
00 V11S "Kermit"
99ST "Stealthy one" (RIP)
"keep your nose off the pavement"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=