[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
- Subject: Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
- From: Mal Stainkey <artmgs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
<<<<
From: "Sanders Walker" <sandune@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ST] ST vs RS
Greetings gentlemen,
I'm not trying to start a war between ST and RS owners
I would like to know
as in maintenance and two up road ability and
suspension if there are major
differences between the two a potential buyer should
be aware of.
>>>
Hi,
They are both great bikes, 2up I would lean towards
the ST as it has slightly lower pillion pegs. However
I just love the look of the RS and it't the one I
would have got even it it was more expensive than the
ST (here in Aus the ST is about $1000AUS more
expensive)
'01 RS (yellow of course :)
=====
bye for now
Mal
artmgs@xxxxxxxxx
"Don't think..... feel" Bruce Lee
"Feel......don't think" Qui-Gon Jinn
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=