[ST] Re:Triumph quality?

[KenTmpsnmc@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 5/12/01 9:56:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
owner-st-digest@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< I think we all paid a premium on our bikes for the "Triumph quality", so I
 expect them to honour it. >>

BMW, yes..Harley Davidson, well, bad example...Honda, absolutely.. but since 
when has Triumph had a reputation for quality?  Any company must build their 
reputation over the years with satisfied customers.  Triumph IMO, while 
certainly not bad, has yet to establish itself as a premier manufacturer.  I 
like Triumphs for the guts of building the triple and a well rounded machine. 
 But they clearly are a cut below the japanese and other 1st rung 
manufacturers in the glitch department.  But like any good startup their 
improving some all the time.

Ken T. from Ca.
"tossed aside like cheap truck stop fare"

95' Trident, 96' Virago 11, 99' Triumph Sprint ST
http://www.labiker.com/gallery/images/K_M/kent.html

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=