[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: [ST] Re:Triumph quality?



Obviuosly never had a Suzuki, my ST is heaps better than my previous suzuki.
Try riding through a British winter and then compare...............IMO
Triumph wind hands down

Bradders

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
KenTmpsnmc@xxxxxxx
Sent: 12 May 2001 18:38
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ST] Re:Triumph quality?


In a message dated 5/12/01 9:56:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
owner-st-digest@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

<< I think we all paid a premium on our bikes for the "Triumph quality", so
I
 expect them to honour it. >>

BMW, yes..Harley Davidson, well, bad example...Honda, absolutely.. but since
when has Triumph had a reputation for quality?  Any company must build their
reputation over the years with satisfied customers.  Triumph IMO, while
certainly not bad, has yet to establish itself as a premier manufacturer.  I
like Triumphs for the guts of building the triple and a well rounded
machine.
 But they clearly are a cut below the japanese and other 1st rung
manufacturers in the glitch department.  But like any good startup their
improving some all the time.

Ken T. from Ca.
"tossed aside like cheap truck stop fare"

95' Trident, 96' Virago 11, 99' Triumph Sprint ST
http://www.labiker.com/gallery/images/K_M/kent.html

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=