Re: [ST] Re:Triumph quality?

["Ashley Bennett" <spondon955@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Triumph very early on got a well deserved reputation for quality, the only
problems I have with the quality of my bikes is that the paint has peeled
off the sump which I think wasn't helped by a couple of salty British
winters. Apart from that they are great.
Ashley
'00 Spondon 955i
'95 Speed Triple
>
> BMW, yes..Harley Davidson, well, bad example...Honda, absolutely.. but
since
> when has Triumph had a reputation for quality?  Any company must build
their
> reputation over the years with satisfied customers.  Triumph IMO, while
> certainly not bad, has yet to establish itself as a premier manufacturer.
I
> like Triumphs for the guts of building the triple and a well rounded
machine.
>  But they clearly are a cut below the japanese and other 1st rung
> manufacturers in the glitch department.  But like any good startup their
> improving some all the time.
>



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=