Re: [ST] was: Mobile Phone flame war - TORCH ON! >> political help

[Tom Emberson <ate_st@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Enrico wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tom Emberson" <ate_st@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [ST] was: Mobile Phone flame war - TORCH ON! >> political help
> 
> 
> > 
> > So let me get this straight. I lived down here for almost 4 years, think
> > I know what is going on, but a good old sanity check is in order.
> > 
> > 
> > liberal == democrate == socialist but with out a lot of religeon
> 
> I'm afraid to say that you are not right with your equalization. If you will name a liberal person a "socialist w/o a lot of religion" you may run in a state of emergency and a conflict :-)


remember, I am talking about US politics, you now know why I am so confused.

Yes, the democrate have the socialist point of view, but have a definate "Seperation
of church and state", where the republicans are very much capitilistic, reduce
governement (as long as they don't loose their jobs) allow people to help themselves (ie. less
UI, welfare, etc.) but yet we should all be good god fearing folks and Bush is getting
in relegsous and family values where he can.

I just don't get it. 

Enrico, your right, if the US made sence, the democrates would be the socialists AND
be good god fearing folk, where the republicans should be capitilistic pegans.

But sadly, as I am not the king, I am just trying to figure out what happened.

Tom

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=