[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] 190 on rear



I haven't gotten to coefficient of friction, shear stress and shear 
strength of the rubber yet.  That's another "discussion".

John
'02 RS
Chattanooga

Tom Emberson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
>>Didn't i reply to this before?
>>
>>The answer is yes, they will have the same contact patch area.
> 
> 
> The more I think about this, I think you are confusing contact
> patch and traction, as we all know, if you remove the fact that
> the rubber is a deformable material, it does not matter
> how big the contact patch is, with equal weight on that patch you will be
> able to be able to transmit a certain amount of force to the ground.
> 
> But when you consider that rubber is very deformable, as well each
> small amount of material can only take so much stress before it will tear
> itself, you need 2 ft. wide tires on the back.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> /*************************************************************
>  Thomas Emberson, Dallas, TX
>  '00 Yamaha WR400F (self abuse in style)
>  '01 Suzuki TL1000s
>  '03 Yamaha FJR1300
> 
>  sold: '98 ZX6e, '99 ZX9r, '95 EX500
>  killed by rocks: '01 BRG Sprint ST (18 months old, 25,152 miles)
> *************************************************************/
> 
> 
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> 


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=