[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] MCN: Eight 2002 Triumphs on test
- Subject: RE: [ST] MCN: Eight 2002 Triumphs on test
- From: "David McCarthy" <dave.mac@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:49:42 -0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bil
> Swartz
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:44 PM
> To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ST] MCN: Eight 2002 Triumphs on test
>
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, brian wrote:
>
> > "It's just a shame that the brakes didn't get a tweak."
> >
> > Are they serious? I thought Triumph's brakes were some of the best in
> > the business?
>
> Indeed they are! That's one of the impressions that led me to believe the
> MCN moniker someone else posted: More Crap than News
>
Guess they may have had a bad one. I recall someone posting not to long ago
that the FI on the 2002 Daytona was the worst he had ridden. That must have
been a bad one too as it's been great on all the others.
Having said that MCN do always seem to have an Anti-Triumph biaise. Seems
bizarre that what were often considered the best brakes in the business can
become poor with no physical changes. As before and the MCN Anti-Triumph
bit.
Dave Mc
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=