Re: [ST] Fuel consumption

["Philip Guy" <bike@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the stats BRG.  Interesting how there hasn't been much change
(ignoring the IAM figure), I wonder if this is partly due to the new tune.
Forgive my ignorance, but what is the difference in changing the front
sprocket to 17 as I have done and changing the rear to 45 as u have done.
Except for the obvious slight differences in performance (I'll have to amend
and have a look at the spreasheet values for the 45), does a bike prefer to
have a rear sprocket change, does it enhance or reduce something?  In other
words, why do some people change the rear and others the front, am I missing
something ?

Black Dawg
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Tynan" <keith.tynan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "WaleSWeST RX" <WaleSWeST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 8:05 PM
Subject: [ST] Fuel consumption



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=