[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Bridgestones
- Subject: Re: [ST] Bridgestones
- From: "Charlie McCullough" <charliem90@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:08:21 -0400
hmmmm.......
I ran an 020 this past weekend for the first time in some pretty twisty
stuff (North Georgia/Western Carolina) having replaced a BT57 on the front
(rear already had an 020) Noticed no tendency to want to stand up under
braking. Running 36f/40r pressure.
Did seem to have a quicker turn-in/response than the BT57 - kept having to
adjust line w/rear brake initially 'til I got used to characteristic.
Charlie McCullough
tz250 WERA#90
Duc 748
Triumph ST (red)
- -----Original Message-----
From: Rick & Joyce <rnjwesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, June 17, 2002 2:27 PM
Subject: [ST] Bridgestones
>I like most characteristics of my recently-installed BT020's.
>There's no question they inspire more confidence than my
>previous favorites, Dunlop's D205. I now scrub the rear all the
>way to the edge & my riding mates are commenting on my improved
>skills.
>
>My concern is the tendancy for the bike to stand up and run wide
>under trail braking.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=