[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Official Results HP/Torque
- Subject: Re: [ST] Official Results HP/Torque
- From: Troy Dawson <t_d@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:22:30 -0700
On Thursday, October 3, 2002, at 12:41 PM, Chris Warren wrote:
> Pipe w/performance tune:
> 3000, 30, 53
> 3250, 32, 53
> 3500, 33, 52
> 4000, 44, 58
> 4500, 52, 62
> 5000, 60, 64
> 5500, 66, 64
> 6000, 73, 64
> 6500, 77, 63
> 7000, 80, 61
> 7500, 86, 62
> 8000, 92, 61
> 8500, 94, 58
> 9000, 96, 56
yep, flat torque -> linear power deliver. Yumm.
By comparison, check out the jump in torque @ 7000RPM with Honda's 2002
VFR:
http://www.twobros.com/Cust_Service/Dyno_Charts/
Hon_VFR800FI_Stash_Dyno.pdf
RPM->HP->FtLb
6800, 62, 49
7000, 75, 55
equivalent to going from ~5200RPM to ~6400 on the ST w/ tune. There's
even a little dip in the torque before the VTEC boost hits. How nice.
Yes, IMO VTEC is a stupid idea, or at least needs a smoother
activation. Honda actually first tried it 15+ years ago with the
CBR400F:
http://www.tamiyausa.com/product/plastic/112motorcycleseries/14039.html
but they called it REV back then. And it was very unpopular then, too.
=td=
['86 CBR400F Endurance]
'02 BRG ST
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=