Re: [ST] Gear ratios year to year

["Louis Jiannine" <LouJ9@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree that changing the rear sprocket is better for the chain but in the
event the chain is not long enough, then down one in front is an option.  I
was only considering that option because I thought my 02 ST has a 19 tooth
countershaft.  Now I hear that it is 18.  I guess I will go up teeth in the
back if a change is made.

Are the 2002 ST models geared lower than 2001s? (overall)  In 6th at an
indicated 4000 RPM the indicated speed is about 72.  How does that compare?

Lou


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Colt4530 <colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ST] Gear ratios year to year


> Changing the rear sproket is much better for the chain and sprockets,
> too.  A smaller front increases stress in the chain and front sprocket.
>
> John
>
> Louis Jiannine wrote:
> > Speaking of gearing, I have a question.  Is the stock chain long enough
to
> > reach around a back sprocket that is two teeth larger than stock?  Three
> > teeth?
> >
> > My 2002 ST has very tall gearing.  My local shop tells me that a Triumph
18t
> > countershaft sprocket is over $90.00.  I have never had good luck with
> > aftermarket countershaft sprockets and I want the rubber damper anyway.
> > Since my usual method of gearing down is by changing the back sprocket
> > anyway, that is the next option.
>
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=