[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Possible bad Triumph valve design
- Subject: Re: [ST] Possible bad Triumph valve design
- From: "Mike Benzon" <fast87@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:03:51 -0700
You're right, my mistake.
Mike
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Colt4530" <colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: [ST] Possible bad Triumph valve design
>
>
> Mike Benzon wrote:
> > Yes I can, I will stop by the shop and take some photos of the valves.
The
> > exhaust valves are the most damaged. Probably due to their heavier
weight
> > with the same valve spring as their intake counterpart, which goes
further
> > to support the argument.
>
> It quite rare for the exhaust valves to be heavier. They are smaller
> since the pressure and temp of the exhaust gasses are higher and
> therefore are easier to evacuate.
>
> --
> John Albright
> '02 RS
> Chattanooga
> C-RATs Pack Leader
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=