[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] OT: geek Q - amd numbers
- Subject: Re: [ST] OT: geek Q - amd numbers
- From: Andrew Tait <antait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:41:04 +0100
Hello,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:21:00 -0400 (EDT), Bil Swartz <bil@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hey all, sorry for wasting bandwidth on a totally OT post but I know we
> have more than a few geeks amoungst us...
>
> What's the secret formula, or is there a chart, that converts the AMD cpu
> numbers (like 2600) into a comparable clock speed like Pentiums are
> commonly listed with?
It can't be done. The AMD chips' _names_ are designed by AMD to
correspond to the appropriate clock speed of the P4, but the AMD uses all
sorts of optimisations to achieve this, and these change as it
progresses. I believe I am correct in saying that the XP2800+ runs at a
slower clock speed than the XP2600+ (but I'm not checking, so could be
wrong)
Just to keep the thread off topic: Why?
Totty <8^)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=