Re: [ST] New Member

["colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx" <colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The "logic" is that the SSSA puts a moment (twist) into the frame at the
swing arm pivot and the DSSA does not.  The moment prestresses the frame
making it less likely to flex in some directions and more likely to flex in
others.  

John

Original Message:
- -----------------
From:  JAU149@xxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:01:45 -0500
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ST] New Member


In a message dated 2/2/2004 7:19:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,
colt4530@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

> 
> The SSSA version is an ST with RS bars and fairings. 

Really?  Then that would also mean that the 04 RS has the same steering
geometry as the ST ( a little more relaxed than the RS ). Is this correct ? 
> 
> I object to the SSSA for it's lack of logic and extra weight.  I bought
> my RS rather than the ST almost entirely because of the 
> swing arm.  

Not you really have my interest. What "logic' is that? what steered you
away from the ST?  


- -John
> 

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   * 
*
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info


- --------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=