[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Re: st-digest V2004 #76
- Subject: Re: [ST] Re: st-digest V2004 #76
- From: "Mike Benzon" <TiggerToo090@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:21:01 -0800
Oh heck, I wish I would have read your posting before I responded to Rich's
posting, you're right about the distance from the eyes to the face shield.
Mike
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <phsammut@xxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: [ST] Re: st-digest V2004 #76
>
>
>
>
> RE: Does anyone know if it is possible to get an optical prescription
> face
> shield for a full face helmet?
>
> Rich
>
> The main problem is the distance from your eyes. Your glasses sit about a
> quarter - to - a half an inch from your eyes and they achieve reasonable
> clarity. Now start pulling them away and see what happens to your image
> clarity, distortion etc. Contact lenses are much better because they've
> reduced that distance to nothing. Even if you'd be able to compensate for
> the distance, you would have NO peripheral vision, which is not a good
> thing.
>
> Paul
>
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=