[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] for Rick - theRub
- Subject: RE: [ST] for Rick - theRub
- From: "STeve Duncan" <xhippy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:42:00 -0500
>
>Dunc,
>What differences were you able to notice? Did you consider staying with
>the
>smaller tire?
>
>I've head you'll have quicker turn-in and generally more responsive
>handling. Can you guys quantify the changes?
>
>I can't help but wonder if the disadvantages of the bigger rear tire
>outweigh the advantages?
>
>...unless "looking good" is a high priority ;o).
>
>--Rick in Oregon
> '01 Sprint ST
Hey Rick,
I've run 180, 170, AND 190 rear tires over the years, and to tell ya the
truth, I can't really tell ya there is a nickel's worth of difference
between all three. The 170 is a little quicker/easier in turn in? Maybe.
The 190 feels a bit more planted, especially in bumpy corners? Probably
not. But then I guess I'm just not a quick enough / good enough rider to
tell all the subtle differences the really "good" riders can. I will say
one thing, the 170 would spin up a lot easier coming out of a corner.
Besides I'm, like, really vain, concerning big fat ones, so I just stick
with the 190 :))
STeveDuncan
Tejas
just an average rider
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
End of st-digest V2004 #562
***************************
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
End of Triumph ST/RS Digest
ST/RS Digest is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
This digest Copyright 1999-2002 TriumphNet.com