Re: [ST] ST new bags

[triumph1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

All luggage is ugly on a bike, but practical when you need to carry 
stuff.  I own soft accessories so I can get it off the bike quickly.

Tim Ellioitt

Dan Wetherington wrote:
> 
>>>>mheyer@xxxxxxxxx 9/9/2004 11:50:30 AM >>>
> 
> UGH!!  I know they are useful, but the top boxes are UGLY!!  Sorry -
> just my
> opinion.  I never really liked the bike with the hard luggage, looks
> wise.
> The soft luggage appears more sporty and fitting of the bike.
> 
> And yes, the new luggage is ugly and resemble some sort of pontoons...
> 
> 
> Matt Heyer
>  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> 
> Doesn't it look to you guys like the bags are the same (right v. left)?
>  I wonder if they did this to cut down costs, and then will sell a
> "third" sidebag as the topbox... kind of like the setup Kawi sells for
> the ZZR1200.  I much prefer the current (99-04) style of bags to these.
> 
> Dan (who's looking more and more for that blue 02-04 ST)
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> www.packereng.com
> 
> 
> 
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
> 
> 

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=