[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] ST new bags
- Subject: Re: [ST] ST new bags
- From: "John Petrey, Jr." <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:20:11 -0500
At 03:44 PM 9/9/2004, you wrote:
>All luggage is ugly on a bike, but practical when you need to carry
>stuff. I own soft accessories so I can get it off the bike quickly.
>
>Tim Ellioitt
Yeah, I dunno, you are about the third person to say that but I really
didn't think the previous ones looked _too_ bad on there. Better without?
Oh hell yeah, no comparison. But if you gotta tote some stuff they a nice
compromise, IMO. The old ones just seem to 'fit' better or blend with the
rest (of the lines) of the bike.
Apex Dawg
Still one bag short;-(( Still looking for it everyday on the way home.
After the first freeze when the kudzu and other thick low foliage dies off
I have my fingers crossed I'll be able to see it.
>Dan Wetherington wrote:
>>
>>>>>mheyer@xxxxxxxxx 9/9/2004 11:50:30 AM >>>
>>UGH!! I know they are useful, but the top boxes are UGLY!! Sorry -
>>just my
>>opinion. I never really liked the bike with the hard luggage, looks
>>wise.
>>The soft luggage appears more sporty and fitting of the bike.
>>And yes, the new luggage is ugly and resemble some sort of pontoons...
snip
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=