[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- Subject: RE: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?
- From: "Heyer, Matthew A." <mheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:53:07 -0500
UH OH!!!!! Not a tire thread!!!! Let's stay on subject boys; that is,
what tires did the RS vs the ST come with. You can obviously put
anything you want on there...
Matt Heyer
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Gavin Lawrie
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 12:42 PM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and
ST?
On 1 Feb 2005, at 11:24, simonb wrote:
> It would be interesting to know what tyres where fitted to both bikes.
> For me this makes one of the biggest differences in how a bike
handles.
My ST has BT020's (about 3.5K miles used so far), the RS had BT57s
presumably from new, so about same mileage. My ST had BT57s on too
when I first got it, and I found handling improved when I put the 020s
on. But based on what I've read in this forum and elsewhere, I suspect
I'll switch to Avon Azarro ST's when I next put new tyres on.
Best regards
Gavin Lawrie
ST'03
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=