Re: [ST] What are the non-cosmetic differences between RS and ST?

[simonb <simonb@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 17:41 +0000, Gavin Lawrie wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2005, at 11:24, simonb wrote:
> 
> > It would be interesting to know what tyres where fitted to both bikes.
> > For me this makes one of the biggest differences in how a bike handles.
> 
> My ST has BT020's (about 3.5K miles used so far), the RS had BT57s 
> presumably from new, so about same mileage.  My ST had BT57s on too 
> when I first got it, and I found handling improved when I put the 020s 
> on.  But based on what I've read in this forum and elsewhere, I suspect 
> I'll switch to Avon Azarro ST's when I next put new tyres on.

Some of it could be the difference between part warn tyres with a flat
spot and new tyres...

- -- 
simonb <simonb@xxxxxxxxxxx>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=