RE: [ST] not an ST....

["Ken Mitchell" <kp.mitchell@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My guess....a Yellowbox corrector set to make things look "better", because
there's NO WAY that bike is going by that scenery at 220+. You don't even
have to have been in mid-triple digits to know this. You've all seen shots
from bike-mounted cameras during races, not the same look. You've seen
in-car shots from F1 or NASCAR (ugh), not the same kind of speed. Steve sees
it, I see it, does anyone else?

Ken M.
'00 RS 

- -----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawler
Subject: Re: [ST] not an ST....

In a previous email, Ken Mitchell stated:
> Can anyone read it better than me?
Near the 70 on the outer ring is what appears to be 100 on the inner ring.
This would make the outer ring mph.

Something does look fishy. The scenery doesn't appear to be moving at the
indicated speed.


- --
Steve Lawler
Verona, NJ, USA

2001 Sprint ST "Blue Devil"

"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who
have not got it."
            -- George Bernard Shaw


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=