[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: [ST] RS vs 05 ST vs Thruxton



Marc

I had an 05 Bonneville for a day while my RS was serviced.  It was fun
but I don't want one.  The upright position made my posterior ache after
very little time, and three-digit mph was a struggle.

It pulled away from standstill beautifully, made a lovely sound at low
speed and low speed manoeuvring was hilariously easy.  I could almost
ride with my knees touching each other too.

Getting back on the RS I thought it was a racing bike!

Tee hee.
Chris Harwood
00 RS

>>> MarcVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11/07/2005 09:24:07 >>>
greetings all.

I did a long ride with a bunch of riders from the local triumph club
yesterday. In all 8 riders pitched, plus a guy on a K1200RS Beemer. We
did 530 kms (330 miles) though some decent passes, and I had 60km run
through the Montague pass on a demo ST1050.

I also got a chance to try out the new Thruxton on Friday.

here's my two cents worth:

The Thruxton is brilliant fun - don't ride this if you don't want to
buy one. Its contagious! This one had free-flow pipes, sounds fantastic,
and goes very well. Its a great bike for short runs, the Sunday ride was
too long and fast on the open stretches for the two riders on  Thruxtons
. I could see myself buying one of these as a nice second bike to have -
it gets attention everywhere and its a hoot to ride.

The ST1050 is a very well balanced package. Has more grunt than my RS,
and a more comfortable smoother ride. The suspension is a touch soft for
my taste, the back end especially, I found it affected my confidence in
the twisty stuff. I prefer a more "planted" feel. 

The wind protection is spot on, and the mirrors are better, although
they vibrate a bit. The lights and dash are also an improvement. It was
very hot when I rode it - at least 30 degrees Celsius, and I didn't find
it any warmer that my RS.

As a sport tourer it makes other alternatives (like the VFR800) look
pathetic. Way nicer to ride than the VFR, with a potent top end rush my
RS doesn't have.

That said, I actually prefer my RS . I prefer the stiffer suspension
and the noise my RS makes.

For the ST1050 to work for me it would need a set of free-flow pipes to
give it more character, and more compression and rebound damping
adjustment on the rear end.


cheers


Marc
Cape Town

Information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is intended 
for the use of the person(s) to whom it was addressed. 
If you are not the addressee, you may not copy, forward, disclose or
deliver 
this message or any part of it to anyone else.If you received this
e-mail in error, 
please reply to the sender of this message, and delete the mail.Any
views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender,except where the sender
specifically states 
them to be those of The Foschini Group of Companies, to whom no
liability shall attach whatsoever.

The Foschini Group disclaims all liability for any loss, damage or
expense however caused, arising 
from the use or reliance upon the information provided through this
service. 
Any recipient of an unacceptable communication, a chain letter or
offensive material 
of any nature is requested to report this to email address:
security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com