[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: [ST] for Rod - s.o.p.
- Subject: RE: [ST] for Rod - s.o.p.
- From: "Heyer, Matthew A." <mheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:10:31 -0500
While they may all state it in their manuals, some are more pushy about
throughout their organization (corporate down to dealers). I have felt
that Triumph is much more "our way is the only way" as opposed to the
Jap brands at least.
Matt Heyer
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-st@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of don
draper
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:56 PM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ST] for Rod - s.o.p.
>>> one area where I do not like Triumph, not the service, but a
corporate attitude that Triumph Knows Best and you must use factory
certified mechanics <<<
You mean you've heard of a brand that has a different precept?
The 50+ motorcycles I've owned from manufacturers in Japan, Sweden
Canada, Italy, Czechoslavakia, England, Germany, Austria & the U.S.
have ALL specified the same propriety in their owmer's manuals.
Cheers; doggydoo - - - o&\o
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=