[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] MCN 05 ST Review
- Subject: Re: [ST] MCN 05 ST Review
- From: iPat <pmdavies@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:34:55 +0100
Ride magazine had a readers poll and it came number one
its subjective. Reviewers will always be prejudiced and some of these
magazines depend on their advertising.......
On 9/13/05, dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Really came out bad for Triumph. Sounds like they got a bike that was not prepped at all or was thrashed by other mags first. I usually put a lot of faith in MCN, but certainly would not by a VFR as a result of this test. Wonder if Triumph will provide a properly set up unit or weatehr they consider MCN as a mag with little influence. It's one of the few I read from cover to cover.
--
iPat
if you have any preconception of yourself, you cannot comprehend the
unknown, that which is spontaneous.
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com