[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] for Benjamin F. - Re: Counter Rotating Brakes
- Subject: Re: [ST] for Benjamin F. - Re: Counter Rotating Brakes
- From: Matthew Heyer <matthewheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Ah missed that. Personnally, I'm more interested in the turning force effect (I can already squeeze my brakes hard enough to lock them up if I need - I don't know that I want to lock them any easier...)
Matt Heyer
----- Original Message ----
From: Neil Lindsey <Neil.Lindsey@xxxxxxx>
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Matthew Heyer <matthewheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:25:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ST] for Benjamin F. - Re: Counter Rotating Brakes
apparently you didn't read point #3 in the article Matt
http://www.reverserotatingrotors.com/
reducing turn-in effort may be the main benefit, but improved brake
performance is another.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Heyer" <matthewheyer@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: [ST] for Benjamin F. - Re: Counter Rotating Brakes
> We are now missing the point - these counter-rotating brakes have
nothing to do with increased stopping power. They are dealing with the
issue of force needed to turn a bike at high speeds.
>
> Matt Heyer
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/317 - Release Date: 4/18/06
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com