[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] db's and ears (was "Offroad exhaust" tune?)
- Subject: Re: [ST] db's and ears (was "Offroad exhaust" tune?)
- From: brettwilson21@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:43:40 -0500
Hey all,
Theres seems to be a lot of interest in this topic. I've been reading all the info posted here with great interest. I've done a fair bit of research into intercom/radio comms/music for use on motorcycles myself and found a lot of stuff with a lot of claims, but invariably the result being varying degrees of lack of success.
Needless to say there is very little available in my part of the world. Infact walking into a motorcycle accessories store and raising the topic usually brings a blank stare followed by "What do you want something like that for?"
Never the less, I am very keen to carry on. Given that there is a wealth of equipment and experience available in the USA, (thank you for the websites), if someone is going to pursue this, I would love to work with you, with a view to bringing something Down Under, as I firmly believe there is demand for a quality system that performs as intended and so far no one is really providing this.
Ping me off list.
Cheers
Brett
Sydney
-----Original Message-----
From: John Ulizzi <jaulizzi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:24:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [ST] db's and ears (was "Offroad exhaust" tune?)
First let me comment on audibility. While the mathematical relationships in the
statement below are correct, a 3 db difference is certainly discernable to the
human ear. Suttle, yes, but very discernable. A 10 db difference is significant.
Very significant...at 30 or 40 or 50, its the difference between a whisper and a
normally spoken voice. Somewhere above 100, 10 db is the diffference between
just plain loud and the threshold of pain...
Woovis, to answer your question directly:
The plugs with 10 db less attenuation will let twice as much sound
through...twice the helmet speaker volume, but also twice the wind noise, and in
my opinion it will accomplish nothing. What you may try as a cheap and easy
solution is a pair of earplugs with selective attenuation, where they attenuate
differently at different frequencies. Try www.directsafety.com. Good folks, good
products, and although you have to buy in bulk, they will send you a sampler of
a few different earplugs if you ask them nice. ( While you are there, check out
their safety glasses). They are shatter proof, stylish, have LARGE bend
radiuses, and are cheap enough to be disposable....I get a few pairs in various
shades, nest them together in my tank bag, and after they have been dropped a
few times, I just pitch them and grab a new pair). Anyway, they should have some
earplugs you will find interesting. Thats the cheap and dirty solution.
The correct solution to this problem, I believe, does not yet exist to my
knowledge, at least not in its entirety. The problem that we face as
motorcyclists is wind noise. Lots of it. Enough to cause hearing damage on its
own. So we where earplugs to combat that. Now we cant hear shit. We need to turn
our helmet speakers up so loud the helmet rattles.. not really a solution
either. I believe the solution to the problem is two fold: 1) Earbud speakers
built into form fitting earplugs that specifically fit YOUR ear. These do exist,
there were at least two companies selling them at the show, and 2) a setup
with an interaural microphone, which I have not yet found.
The form fitting earplugs are noteworthy for their sealing qualities. While I
have not used them myself ( I am lucky enough to get a satisfactory seal from
the cheapie earplugs, and, in spite of what I do for a living, or perhaps
because of it, I have not yet had the desire to add audio or intercomm to my
motorcycling) , there is hard evidence as to the quality of their seal, etc,
etc. Depending on the compound used, you can select the desired db of
attenuation. But what is more significant about these is that they separate the
desired sound from the undesired....the transducer is mounted within these
plugs, and is in front of the seal, while the wind is behind the seal and its
noise kept out. Additionally, since you now dont have to overcome the wind
noise, and have a VERY small sealed airspace to compress, your power
requirements are much less, your output volume is much less, and unless you
insist on listening to head banging acid rock at insane levels while you ride,
yo
ur
hearing will last longer. The gain in quality is quite substantial. Clarity and
dialogue intelligability are way , way better with this style of earpiece.
Frequency response and fidelity are much better for music as well. MUCH BETTER,
as in real, tight, controlled bass response, accurate image and tonal balance,
etc, if that sort of thing matters to you. Its all about getting the sound you
want up above the noise floor of the sound you dont want. Helmet speakers just
crank up the volume to get above the already high noise floor of the wind. With
earplugs in, you now have attenuated everything, but at different levels, and
inconsistently so. What you really lose is the suttle, quiet stuff. These
earpieces crush the noise floor, allowing the ability to hear suttle things over
the transducer, be it inflection in the voice of the person you are talking to,
or the little voices in the background on "Dark Side of the Moon"...and all of
this at lower perceived volume to the listene
r, which
goes a long way toward preventing fatigue on those long rides, and long term
hearing loss...While I dont yet own a pair, I have played around with them quite
a bit, and they work real well. The $300 pair price tag is what has kept me
away, that and the concious decision to not have music or the squawking SO
intrude on my ride.....
That is the larger half of the equation. Doable, and very effective for a
price. And your Chu Moy amp will increase the sound quality that much more...
The other half of the equation, one which I have yet to find a solution for ,
is on the microphone end if you are using intercomm. What you really need is an
interaural microphone. Ask any of the people that make these intercomm/music
products, though, and they have no clue what you are talking about. Attempt to
explain it to them, and they look at you like you are from another planet (
'course I am used to that anyway..). An interaural mic would also be placed on
the inside of your earplug. It gathers your voice from within the earcanal, also
isolated from wind noise. They do exist, however, I have yet to see one in use
in one of these type products. If somone would make this, it would be the
solution. You would have serious , contained sound quality, and you would have
voice activated intercomm, without windnoise at either end.....I have not yet
found this solution. Perhaps it is available if you mixed and matched some
different headsets and things.
The best example I can give you on noise floor is this : compare a CD to a
recording of that same CD on a cassette tape ( remember those ). Particularly if
you are listening to a piece of music with many quiet passages, like some
classical pieces. If you get to a quiet passage, you will find yourself
struggling to hear the music over the noise floor of the tape hiss. This is not
a problem during the louder passages of the music. The noise floor is relativley
constant. What you want is the desired sounds sufficiently above that noise
floor. As with the CD, at the same volume, you can hear those quieter passages
clearer, because the noise floor is sufficently lower, practically non existent.
Okay, I will apologise now to the rest of you for the off-topic
technobabble...I can visualize eyes glazing over and such. Ping me or call me if
you need more...
John Ulizzi
216-486-9371
Bil Swartz <bil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Sprint ST wrote:
> For example, in communications there have been tests that show a 3db
> increase in sound levels could not be detected by the human ear. It
> took a 10db increase to be detected reliably. 3db is double the power
> output and 10db is 10 times the power.
Hey Rod,
I'm hoping that the example you mention above means you know a bit about
that subject as I've been debating what to do about bike comms to make
things more usable.
After going thru many prodcuts I've found Motocomm headsets and an
FRS/GMRS radio make for a nice system for under $100/ea. We still have a
hard time hearing when we're at speed though (65+) so was looking toward
amplifying things. Tried the boostaroo and a small CMoy/MINT type amp
that help a little but not quite enough.
We usually wear earplugs, such as Leight (sp?) Laser-Lites. I tried an
alternative plug one day, one of the firmer bell shaped numbers which
seemed to let more sound through.
So the question is, with the Laser-Lites claiming about a 33db reduction
(I think it is), would a plug that claims a 23db reduction let more of the
helmet speaker through and make a difference?
Thanks for anythying you can tell me. I'm going to see if I can find a
plug like the Laser-Lites in construct but with a lower db reduction to
test with.
--
._O_. '03 Sprint ST
-Bil- /_\o/_\ '98 Thunderbird Sport /~\
"No I don't want a pickle..." /H\ '98 VFR800FI -hers ASCII \ / Against
bil@xxxxxxxxxx (=O=) '89 Hawk GT -hers Ribbon X HTML
"Drink Real Ale" "Quch!" 66 U AMA,CMHmoto,HSTA! Campaign / \ Mail
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com