Re: [ST] Ten Best Bikes 2006

[Dave Bardell <dbardell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nate,

I agree 100%, that's why I look at the rest of the choices with raised 
eyebrow.
Dave

Nathan Maher wrote:

>  > Not bad.  Not that I place much credence in the mags with
>  
>
>>all the ads, but it's gotta be good press for Triumph.
>>    
>>
>
>Dave,
>
>In this case shouldn't it actually reinforce the position that the 
>Triumph is the better bike?  Triumph has a pretty meager add budget 
>compared to the big 3 so in my head when the 675 started doing well in 
>the shootouts it was a pretty clear indication that they got something 
>right with the bike.
>
>Overall it's just nice to see them get some positive press since they've 
>been maligned for the most part, especially when it came to the ~600cc 
>entries.  Not that it wasn't deserved a bit in the past, can't say I was 
>ever that big a fan of the TT600, although I rode one and it wasn't 
>nearly as bad as expected.
>
>Nate
>00SprintRS
>_______________________________________________
>Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
>Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com