Re: [ST] OT Daytona 600 vs 650

["Jeremy Witt" <jeremyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm embarrassed.  I completely forgot the TT became the Daytona before
the jump to 650.  In my defense, I was still a Honda man at the time!


<going silent> 

Jeremy Witt
Field Engineer
Corrugated Networking Services Inc.
Office: 603-703-0365

-----Original Message-----
From: st-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:st-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rupert Galea
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:56 PM
To: ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ST] OT Daytona 600 vs 650

On 3/27/06, Jeremy Witt <jeremyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't have any of the magazines on hand reviewing the 650, but check
this:  http://tinyurl.com/zvtd9
>
> Overall, opinions are that the handling of the TT600 was the only high
point.  Crappy FI, ugly bodywork, etc.  Search for reviews.  There are
plenty online.
>
> Personally, I'd go for the 650 given the choice.  :0)

I don't think Mike is talking about a TT600.
He is talking about a Daytona 600 vs a Daytona 650.

Reviewers seem to thing the extra 50cc added a decent amount of grunt
to the mid-range power.
http://tinyurl.com/qmmm8

Since Mike is in the UK I assume his stepson started on a 125cc and
now has his full license.
Rupert
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com