[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [ST] Repsol
- Subject: Re: [ST] Repsol
- From: Nathan Maher <nate@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:32:31 -0400
Masiak, Richard wrote:
> This article is clearly biased in favor of "poor" Nicky.
Richard,
No offense but clearly there's a fine line between aggressive and
reckless. Nicky's passing maneuver, by virtue of not causing a
catastrophic crash, gets filed under aggressive and Dani's does not. And
Dani's mistake is made worse by the simple fact that it could be the last
(note: not only) deciding factor in the Championship. Do I feel like
Nicky got cheated? Nope - that's racing and so be it. But it does suck
to have the actions of an unrelated party play such a big role so late in
the season. Nicky clearly needs to work on his consistency as if he'd
one another race or 2 it'd be a non-issue but like I said, this late and
by no fault of his own it just plain sucks.
And speaking of biases, you've clearly defined yours haven't you :)?
Masiak, Richard wrote:
> I just want Rossi to win so it would just be icing on the Italian cake.
My 2¢,
Nate
00SprintRS
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com