[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [St] New spec for 2008 1050 ST
- Subject: Re: [St] New spec for 2008 1050 ST
- From: Matt Knowles <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:40:29 -0800
Couldn't agree with you more.
The only reason in my book for a 1300 cc motor is if they plan to add
two more wheels, a couple of doors and a trunk. Then they could paint
a Union Jack on the roof to show off the British heritage.
Oh wait, never mind, that's already been done.
On Feb 7, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Nathan Maher wrote:
> Onec again I'd just like to explain my disdain for the rumored larger
> motor. I don't know about any of the rest of you but my now-puny
> 955cc
> RS has more than enough grunt for my tastes. Not to mention the
> better
> fuel economy compared to the newer models, cheaper insurance, etc,
> etc.
Matt Knowles - Ferndale, CA - http://www.knowlesville.com/matt/
motorcycles
'99 Sprint ST - for going fast and far (2CZUSA)
'01 KLR650 (A15) - for exploring the North Coast backroads
'97 KLX300 & '01 Lakota - for playing in the dirt
'79 KZ400 - just because it was the first vehicle I ever owned
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com