[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [St] The Future of Motorcycling
- Subject: Re: [St] The Future of Motorcycling
- From: JES_VFR <jes_vfr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:25:12 -0400
At 10:11 AM 3/21/2008, you wrote:
>I think we need a new class of cars. VW's trike demo got 45mpg and out
>handled any car on the road. If it had a optional roof, it would have been
>perfect. Oh yeah, $18,000. that's it!
><snip>
Blah, If I wanted a trike or a quad, that would be what I would own.
Oh wait I do its called car.
I do not think that legalizing the trikes or quads here in the US
would be a good idea. Mostly because of our irresponsible public.
Most drivers don't want to be held accountable for their parts of
causing collisions right now. For the most part these people are
protected by their vehicles. If we put them on these open trikes and
quads, they will get hurt or killed.
>And just to pi$$ you off, the new SMART car, which gets 60 mpg (gas) in
>Europe, only gets 40 mpg here in the US. "Weight and Emissions" so they
>say. Hmmm... Doesn't Europe have stricker emissions restrictions than the
>US?
The emissions changes could be related to crap gasoline that we have
here in the US? European fuels are refined differently and supposedly
have less sulfur and stuff.
The weight issue is purely US DOT crap. US spec bumpers, door guards,
etc that all weigh more that the Euro parts.
Not to mention the idiotic US mileage testing.
more weight, crappy fuels, different tune for emissions, poorly
structured tests all add up to less mileage on the sticker.
JohnS
A Dragon Ascending
"Forging my body in the Fires of my Will"
_______________________________________________
Triumph Sprint ST/RS mailing list
Send list posts to ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Change your list options at www.Triumphnet.com