[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: VFR vs. Sprint (again)
- Subject: Re: VFR vs. Sprint (again)
- From: "Paul Steinbacher" <psteinbacher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 18:30:43 -0700
Richard wrote:
> Interceptor and the Sprint ST. Can anyone help me out? I realize that you
> are all a *bit* biased, but here goes:
We are definitely biased, big time.
> VFR pro's: Honda reliability, everything just as it should be (gauges,
I have had a few Hondas of late (ST1100 and VTR1000) that were less than
stellar in the reliability arena. This should not be a forgone conclusion.
> mileage, lotsa-people-ride-hondas, don't really like the wheels
Everybody rides a Honda, boring.
> The whole thing with Hard bags isn't a big deal to me, as I've never
needed
> them anyway.
If you want to use the bike for some riding the bags are "real" important,
maybe you just have not had the opportunity to experience this.
> I also plan on an under seat exhaust for either bike, as well as the
> appropriate ECU tuning.
Is your Honda dealer offering you a factory supported ECU tune? Will he
stand behind the tune you manage to get? How many options is Honda offering
for the VFR anyway? I really enjoy having something just a bit unique and
the fact that the manufacturer has designed the bike to accomodate options I
might like.
Paul & Delores Steinbacher
97 Buell M2 Cyclone (At least its Red)
98 Suzuki Bandit S1200
99 Triumph Sprint ST(Red Wind)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=