[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Luggage options or saddlebags no
- Subject: Re: Luggage options or saddlebags no
- From: Chuck Fergerson <cferger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 19:06:32 -0700
Dan Mohr wrote:
> > Has anyone here elected to NOT get the hard saddlebags but rather
> >to get ONLY the topcase and required luggage rack / topcase mount? I'm
> >thinking about this as an option since I don't really like the looks of the
> >saddlebags on the bike, the low muffler or the brackets that remain on the
> >bike with the bags off. Besides, with the top case installed, my
> >passenger would have a backrest and OTOH, with the topcase off the bike,
> >you still have the small luggage rack if you need it.
> > With just the topcase, two people could take an overnighter,
> >staying in a motel.
Ok, I haven't purchased my ST yet, (i'm waiting for a certain stock to
appreciate) but I will throw in my $0.02.
I too, dislike the looks of the low-pipe with the saddlebags. I do not,
however, mind the saddlebags. To my mind the top-box alone makes the
bike look like pizza delivery scooter.
I am thinking BW racing underseat pipes with the saddlebags... yeah
- --
Best regards,
Chuck Fergerson
Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/
Earth's Biggest Selection.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=