Re: ST Article

[Bill Flowers <waflowers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Previously, you (Eric Sheley) wrote:
> I didn't get the "not great" feeling at all - more that he couldn't find 
> anything about the bike to be passionate about (using his words).

That's exactly what I meant by "OK but not great".  Perhaps if I'd said
"OK but not outstanding" it would have been clearer.

> He wasn't 
> able to show me any significant problems with the bike and even goes on to 
> say that it can scarcely be faulted. I got the feeling that he just felt it 
> was too much a copy versus something that revolutionary in the sport tourer 
> category.

Evolution of a concept, not revolution.

> But in my normal "try to show both sides" style I want to put all the info 
> out there - good or bad....

And that is good.

> and BTW - I have not found any trouble being passionate about the bike ;-) 

I don't think I'll have any problem that way either.  :-)

- --
Bill


 *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
 The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=