[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Sprocket Dockett Shelly v Lock
- Subject: Re: Sprocket Dockett Shelly v Lock
- From: Eric Sheley <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 20:02:56 -0500
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 TXToday@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> The defendant says the 2000 has gone to a 17 T front sprocket, while the
>> plaintiff says his new 2000 feels more like an 18 T... Anyone know for
sure
>> the difference between the sprockts and chain on the '99 and '00 Sprint
STs?
At 11:32 AM 11/26/1999 -0500, Thomas Emberson wrote:
>My first question would be, did they make the corresponding change
>to the rear???
Rick: I doubt that the chain would be any different. If they have gone to a
17 on the front, it would not be necessary to change the chain (at least
not in my experience). I went to a 16T on the front of my 509, but the
change was too great so I went up to the 17.
Thomas: What change would you be referring to ? Changing the front to a 17
would not necessitate a change to 45 on the rear.
- - Eric
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=