Re: Aftermarket Can

[Eric Sheley <Eric@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 11:27 AM 12/30/00 -0800, lowedaph@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Eric, are you sure about this?
>My understanding was the burden of proof was on the owner, not Triumph. 
>ie. if you installed Carillo rods, and there was subsequent engine 
>failure, you'd have to prove that the rods weren't contributory in order 
>to get it covered under warranty. So, if the system that the aftermarket 
>part is in, is related in any way to the failed system, you'd lose.

Well, the original question was in reference to aftermarket cans. I will 
amend my statement to say "external aftermarket parts".

I would agree that if you perform any internal engine upgrade, you would 
have the burden of proof on your side, and I would guess you would probably 
loose if it came to a claim.

Thanks for catching that

- -Eric 


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=