[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: saddle debate
- Subject: Re: saddle debate
- From: "Lance LaCerte, Psy.D." <LACPSYD@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:02:56 -0700
I like the third option.
;>), Lance
- -----Original Message-----
From: Otterboy <jong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: st@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <st@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 4:27 PM
Subject: saddle debate
>
>
> So I should probably wait until I get mine under my ass, but
>I'm too impatient. I've been looking through the archives and gotten
>some scattered information about the Corbin and some scattered
>information about the Sargent upgrade (that was you Eric, I believe).
>Has anyone had a chance to test them side-by-side? I've heard sketchy
>things about Corbin installations, but don't know if they are rude
>unfounded rumors, or if they are really a nightmare.
>
> On the other hand, for the Sargent, I would be out a saddle for
>a while while they fit it, but with the Corbin, I would have the stock
>saddle to ride while I waited for it.
>
> Or should I just shut the hell up and see if the stock one
>needs improvement?
>
>--
>-jong
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
> http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by the Unofficial ST Website
http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=