[Author Index] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: Pedal, Gear change, Assembly T2080373 (Change of heart by Triumph UK)



could very well be -- but why should we have to guess?


- ----- Original Message -----
From: <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: July 4, 2000 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: Pedal, Gear change, Assembly T2080373 (Change of heart by
Triumph UK)


> Neil Lindsey <neil@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > As for Triumph's decision, I wish they would provide some explanation.
> > Are we to conclude that adjustment flexibility outweighs any benefit
> > that the one-piece shifter would otherwise provide?  If so, why only
> > for the ST?
>
>     Could it be that they just can't get a direct shift to work with the
> gap between the footpeg and the gearchange shaft?  The Daytona lever is
> reported to be too long, making the gap very small; maybe a shorter
> lever requires too much force to shift comfortably?
>
>     Just a thought,
>
>                 Jim
> --
>       jim@         ,'_              Of course, this is a heuristic, which
>   gillespie.org   / -.--.    ___    is a fancy way of saying that it
>                  _\_  ~-.`--'_.-'   doesn't work
>                 / /\\    \--'_ \\
>  '99 Sprint ST  \__/ `---'  \__/                    -- Mark-Jason Dominus
>
>      *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
*
>       The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
>           http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
>    http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info
>


     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
      The ST/RS Mailing list is sponsored by Jack Lilley Ltd.
          http://www.TriumphNet.com/st/lilley for more info
   http://www.TriumphNet.com/st for ST, RS and Mailing List info

=-=-=-= Next Message =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=